https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/ ... heologian/
Here is something of a rebuttal from Fox.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/02/ ... raham.html
I have to say that I don't see much rebuttal-ness to the rebuttal other than some random assertions. Obviously there are more charitable interpretations of the facts that Will uses, but they are all facts.
In the end, I think that Will more or less nails what was wrong with Graham. It is not that he was a bad guy or non-Christian or any of that (his personal failings are typical of most people, so meh), but he wanted to be popular, so he started with that and worked back from there. Could be worse, but not exactly a great either.
This forum is for discussions on the noteworthy events, people, places, and circumstances of both the past and the present (note: pop culture etc... is on the back porch).
1 post • Page 1 of 1