Karen Mallard for Congress

This forum is for discussion of politics, diplomacy, law, and justice
User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7312
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by Jered » Thu Mar 08, 2018 6:29 am

Gun banner makes illegal SBR. Gets roasted on Facebook.

Go look at her FB page. It's hilarious. She's getting roasted over that.
28872083_1817702098282016_2116709351369663450_n.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.

User avatar
Rod
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:08 pm

Re: Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by Rod » Thu Mar 08, 2018 2:06 pm

Isn't that ducky, what a moron. Of course being a liberal, leftist, idiot (damn, repeating myself again), she won't be charged with a crime.
one can be a Democrat, or one can choose to be an American.
Good acting requires an imagination; reality requires a person not getting lost in their imagination.
"It's better to have a gun if you need it". Felix's opthamologist

User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7312
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

Re: Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by Jered » Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:24 am

The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.

User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 12612
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by Netpackrat » Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:45 am

I hope she gets convicted if for no other reason, for the sake of the emasculated fuck she is married to. That was his rifle she cut up.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Ass-op

User avatar
Jered
Posts: 7312
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:30 am

Re: Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by Jered » Fri Mar 09, 2018 1:47 am

You've have to be the most incompetent lawyer ever to not convict.
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.

User avatar
scipioafricanus
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:08 pm

Re: Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by scipioafricanus » Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:49 am

So if you cut the receiver first, then you could cut the barrel and not get pinched for NFA?
If there is a Stairway to Heaven, is there an Escalator to Hell?
If God wanted men to play soccer, he wouldn’t have given us arms. - Mike Ditka

Old Grafton
Posts: 1457
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:07 am

Re: Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by Old Grafton » Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:58 am

To be legal all the dumbass had to do was pop both pins and remove the upper, then chop up the receiver FIRST using the angled cuts prescribed. But NOOOO, it's more DRAMATIC the way she did it.......... :roll:
I'm not old--It's too early to be this late.

User avatar
Rod
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:08 pm

Re: Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by Rod » Fri Mar 09, 2018 3:14 pm

scipioafricanus wrote:So if you cut the receiver first, then you could cut the barrel and not get pinched for NFA?
From my understanding, even if you end up destroying the receiver, you're still in trouble because a. you are supposed to torch it into uneven 3rds, and b. you still need the paperwork. If one of us had done this as a demo, the ATF would already have kicked in our door, shot our dog, handcuffed the whole family with maybe a touch of tasing, ransacked the house, and carted us off to the hoosegow.
one can be a Democrat, or one can choose to be an American.
Good acting requires an imagination; reality requires a person not getting lost in their imagination.
"It's better to have a gun if you need it". Felix's opthamologist

User avatar
Netpackrat
Posts: 12612
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by Netpackrat » Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:50 pm

Keep in mind, the torch/angle cut thing is a guideline only for destroying a machine gun receiver; the object is to make it difficult or impossible for somebody to come along and later weld the sections back into a machine gun. ATF hasn't published any guidance for destroying the receiver of a Title I firearm to my knowledge. I suspect just cutting it such that it is rendered inoperable would be sufficient to legally destroy a non machine gun receiver. But, she didn't do even that before creating her unregistered SBR.
Cognosce teipsum et disce pati

"People come and go in our lives, especially the online ones. Some leave a fond memory, and some a bad taste." -Ass-op

User avatar
Weetabix
Posts: 5504
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Karen Mallard for Congress

Post by Weetabix » Fri Mar 09, 2018 7:11 pm

Maybe someone can convince her to send the lower to someone via USPS. For "recycling." :D
Note to self: start reading sig lines. They're actually quite amusing. :D

Post Reply